After a Nevada crash, the other driver’s declarations page can help identify what insurance information is available, but getting it is not the same as proving fault or securing payment. Nevada has a specific disclosure rule for motor vehicle injury claims. Its timing depends on a written authorization described in the statute, not on the crash date or the first phone call to an insurer. This guide explains what the rule says, how to keep a request organized, and what the page can and cannot establish while you evaluate a Nevada car accident claim.
What a declarations page is useful for
A declarations page is a policy document that summarizes selected information about an insurance contract. Depending on the policy, it may identify a policyholder, the coverage period, a vehicle, or liability limits. The exact contents vary, and the page is not the full policy. It is a useful starting point for understanding what the insurer has recorded, but it does not by itself decide whether the policy applies to a particular crash, whether a person is legally responsible, or what an injured person’s damages are worth.
Those distinctions matter when details are still being checked. A driver’s name, vehicle, policy period, and reported claim may not line up perfectly at first. A declarations page can help expose a question to ask, such as whether the vehicle or policy period matches the incident. It should not be treated as a coverage decision or as a promise that the insurer will pay a particular amount. Keep the document with the rest of the claim record and ask the insurer to explain any mismatch in writing.
The Nevada disclosure rule is tied to a written authorization
NRS 690B.024 applies to a claim for compensation or damages for mental or physical injury under a motor vehicle insurance policy. Under subsection 1, a claimant or the claimant’s attorney may provide a written authorization to the party against whom the claim is asserted, that party’s attorney, and the party’s insurer. The authorization covers obtaining the medical reports, records, films, and bills related to the claim from health care providers. The statute says an authorization given under this subsection may not be revoked without cause.
Subsection 2 sets out the related disclosure step. If the written authorization described in subsection 1 is provided, the other party’s insurer must disclose a copy of the policy’s declarations page to the claimant or the claimant’s attorney within five business days after the insurer receives that authorization. The clock in the text starts when the insurer receives the written authorization. It is not written as five calendar days from the collision, from opening a claim, or from a first request for a phone call. The current official text is in NRS 690B.024.
This is a limited description of what the statute says. The section does not make a police exchange form or a claim number the same thing as the medical-record authorization. It also does not say that every conversation with an adjuster starts the five-business-day period. When tracking the deadline, write down the date and method by which the insurer received the authorization and keep any delivery confirmation or acknowledgment.
Read the authorization before signing it
The declaration-page process is linked to an authorization for medical information. That connection deserves attention. The statute describes records related to the claim, and it says the authorization may not be revoked without cause. Before signing a form, read its scope, the people or companies it names, and the kinds of records it covers. If the wording appears broader than the claim or you do not understand what it permits, ask for an explanation before sending it. You may also get legal advice about the wording and how it fits your circumstances.
Do not assume that every document labeled “medical release” has the same scope. An insurer or another party may send its own form, but the heading alone does not tell you whether its terms match the authorization described by NRS 690B.024. Keep a copy of the exact form you signed, the date you sent it, the recipients, and any version changes. If you choose to provide an authorization, use a complete copy that can be read later rather than relying only on notes from a call.
Make the request easy to identify and track
The statute sets out the authorization and disclosure rule, but it does not provide a checklist of administrative details for a cover message. A clear written transmittal can still reduce confusion. Include identifying information that the insurer can use to route the materials, such as the claimant’s name, the date of the crash, the other party’s name, a claim number if one has been assigned, and the contact information for the claimant or attorney. Label the document as the written authorization under NRS 690B.024 and ask the insurer to confirm when it was received.
Use a delivery method that creates a record. Save the sent email, upload confirmation, fax receipt, or mailing information. If you deliver the document through an online claim portal, save a copy of the submission confirmation and the exact attachment. The practical purpose is to establish what was sent, to whom, and when. This is not a new statutory prerequisite; it is a way to make the timeline easier to verify if there is later disagreement about receipt or completeness.
Keep the request focused. The disclosure rule concerns a copy of the declarations page for the motor vehicle policy connected to the injury claim. It is not a general request for every document in the insurer’s file. A short note can ask the insurer to identify the policy or claim to which its response relates and to state whether it needs clarification about the written authorization. Avoid including unrelated medical details in a routine cover message when the authorization itself already addresses the records being authorized.
What the insurer may redact
NRS 690B.024 allows the insurer to redact personal information from the declarations page, with two stated exceptions: the name of the party and the policy limits must not be redacted. The wording matters. It does not say that every personal detail must appear, and it does not say that all information on the full policy must be turned over through this specific disclosure step. If the copy has redactions, compare them with the rule and ask the insurer to explain any obscured information that appears to include the party’s name or policy limits.
Do not publish or forward the page broadly just because it arrived. It can contain personal information. Store it with the claim materials, share it only with people who need it to handle the matter, and keep the original electronic copy unchanged. If you send it to a lawyer or another authorized adviser, use a secure channel and retain a note of what you shared. Good recordkeeping protects privacy and helps preserve a clear copy for later review.
A declarations page does not answer every coverage question
The page is one part of the policy record. It may point to limits or coverage entries, but the complete policy may contain definitions, conditions, exclusions, endorsements, or other terms that affect a coverage analysis. The page also does not decide who caused the collision or establish the value of medical care, lost income, or other claimed harm. Those questions involve evidence beyond the summary page.
For example, an insurer may need to investigate how the crash happened, who was operating the vehicle, and whether the policy terms apply to the circumstances. A claimant may also have questions about coverage under their own policy. The declarations page should therefore be read alongside claim correspondence and relevant policy materials, not treated as a final answer. For a separate explanation of a different issue, see our article about what to consider when the other driver has no insurance.
Keep third-party and your own coverage questions separate
The other party’s declarations page concerns that party’s motor vehicle policy. It does not replace a review of your own insurance. If you have questions about notifying your insurer or explaining the crash, keep those communications accurate and limited to what you know. A separate guide covers what to consider before calling your own insurer after a Nevada crash. The right questions can differ depending on your policy and the facts.
Some drivers also have medical-payments coverage on their own policy. That is a separate coverage question from requesting the other party’s declarations page. Our overview of MedPay in Nevada explains the subject at a general level. Do not assume that a particular coverage is available or applies until the policy and circumstances are reviewed.
If five business days pass without the page
If the insurer has not sent the declarations page after five business days, first check the timeline against the statute’s trigger. Did the insurer receive the written authorization described in subsection 1? Can you show the date and delivery method? Did the insurer confirm the document was received? A concise follow-up can restate the receipt date, attach or identify the authorization, and ask whether the insurer needs clarification before providing the page. Keep the follow-up and response with the same claim record.
The text of NRS 690B.024 provides a disclosure deadline but does not spell out a separate administrative procedure for every dispute about receipt, scope, or completeness. Avoid turning an unanswered email into an assumption about what the insurer has decided. If the status remains unclear, the written records help a lawyer or other adviser assess the next step. The issue is especially worth reviewing when the request concerns an active injury claim or the authorization’s terms are disputed.
Match the disclosure to your claim records
The text of subsection 2 measures the period from the insurer’s receipt of the written authorization described in subsection 1. The statute does not express this period as five days after the collision or after an initial claim report.
Subsection 2 links its disclosure duty to the written authorization under subsection 1. This article describes that particular statutory process. It does not interpret the effect of every other possible request or communication. Review the form you are asked to sign, because subsection 1 says the authorization may not be revoked without cause.
The statute permits redaction of personal information but expressly says the party’s name and policy limits must not be redacted from the declarations page disclosed under subsection 2. If the copy appears to omit either, keep it and ask the insurer to explain the redaction.
No. It is a policy document, not a determination of fault, coverage, or damages. The page can help identify information for follow-up, while the policy terms and facts still need to be considered.
Keep the signed authorization, delivery record, declarations page, and insurer correspondence together. Do not rely on a verbal summary if you can preserve the underlying document. To discuss a Nevada injury claim or the records connected to it, request a free consultation with Bourassa Law Group.
This article is general information about Nevada law, not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.
1-800-870-8910