What If the Accident Was Partly Your Fault?

Aerial night view of a wide signalized intersection with turn lanes and slip roads lit by streetlights

You don’t need to be innocent to have a case. Plenty of people in Las Vegas walk away from a crash convinced they have no claim because they were speeding a little, or turned a moment too early, or were not wearing a seat belt, and the adjuster on the phone is happy to let them keep believing it.

Nevada law does not work that way. Being partly at fault for a car accident in Nevada reduces what you recover. It does not erase it, unless your share of the blame is bigger than everyone else’s. Here is how the rule works, how percentages actually get argued in Clark County, and how to keep your share honest.

Nevada Does Not Require You to Be Blameless

Nevada follows a modified comparative negligence rule. The statute is NRS 41.141, and the core of it fits in one sentence. Your own negligence does not bar you from recovering as long as it was not greater than the negligence of the parties you are claiming against.

The words matter. The line is “not greater than.” If a jury finds the crash was half your fault and half the other driver’s, you still recover. If it finds you 49 percent at fault, you still recover. It is only when your share climbs past the other side’s, to 51 percent or more, that the claim is gone.

The statute also tells the judge what to instruct the jury. Jurors are told that you cannot recover if your negligence was greater than the negligence of the defendant, or the combined negligence of multiple defendants. That word “combined” matters in multi-car pileups on I-15 or the 215, where you might be 30 percent at fault, one driver 40 percent and another 30 percent. Your 30 is measured against their 70, not against either driver alone.

So the question in a shared fault case is never whether you did anything wrong. It is whether you did more wrong than everyone else put together. Those are very different questions, and the insurer would prefer you confuse them.

How the Percentage Changes What You Take Home

Being allowed to recover is the first half. The second half is how much, and NRS 41.141 sets that out too.

When a case goes to a jury, the jury returns two findings. The first is a general verdict, the total amount of damages you would be entitled to without any regard to your own fault. The second is a special verdict that assigns a percentage of negligence to each party still in the case. Your percentage then comes off the top.

In practice that means a 20 percent share of fault costs you 20 percent of the total. Every point the insurer moves onto your side of the line is a point off your recovery, which is exactly why the insurer works so hard to move them.

The statute also deals with more than one driver on the other side. As a general rule, each defendant is severally liable, meaning each one answers for their own percentage of the judgment and not for anyone else’s. There are exceptions, but the starting point is that the percentages decide the money.

Where Fault Percentages Actually Get Argued in Las Vegas

Fault is not a fact sitting somewhere waiting to be discovered. It is an argument built from evidence, and in a Las Vegas claim that evidence comes from a short list of places.

The crash report. If the collision was inside the city or in unincorporated Clark County, the report comes from Las Vegas Metropolitan Police, which everyone here calls Metro. On the freeways it is usually Nevada Highway Patrol. The officer writes a narrative, draws a diagram, records what each driver said, and often marks a contributing factor against one or both of you. Insurers treat that report as if it were a verdict. It is not. The officer was not there when it happened, and the report is one person’s reconstruction, made in a few minutes on the shoulder of the road. It carries weight, and it can be wrong.

Video. More cars on Las Vegas roads have dashcams every year, and the other driver’s camera helps you just as often as it hurts you. Beyond that, this is a city that films itself. Casino parking structures, gas stations, apartment gates, doorbell cameras in Summerlin and Henderson, and the cameras on RTC buses running down Flamingo and Charleston. Most of that footage is overwritten within days. If it exists, it has to be asked for quickly and in writing.

Witnesses. The driver behind you, the rideshare passenger in the other car, the pedestrian at the corner. A neutral witness who says the light was already yellow when you entered the intersection changes a percentage more than almost anything else. A name and number collected at the roadside is worth more than an hour of argument later.

The vehicles themselves. Where the damage sits on each car, the debris field, the skid marks or the lack of them, and the data most modern vehicles record in the seconds before impact. Physical evidence does not change its story.

Percentages are argued from that pile. Whoever gathers more of it, sooner, generally ends up closer to the number they want.

The Insurer’s First Percentage Is an Opening Bid

Within days of a crash, the other driver’s insurer will usually call. Somewhere in that conversation you will hear a sentence like “based on our investigation, we have determined you were 40 percent at fault.” It is delivered as a finding. It is a bid.

Adjusters know the rule in NRS 41.141 as well as we do. They know that a percentage pinned on you comes straight off the claim, and they know that most people have no idea whether 40 percent is fair, high, or absurd. The number is chosen to sound reasonable and to save the insurer money, in that order.

They also know the second lever. If they can push your share past 50 percent, they owe nothing at all. That is why you sometimes see an insurer argue for 55 or 60 percent on facts that would never support it in front of a jury. The argument does not need to win in court. It only needs to make you doubt your claim enough to accept less.

Why What You Say at the Scene Follows You

The single most common way people hand percentage points to the other side is by talking. Not lying, just talking.

“I’m so sorry.” “I didn’t even see you.” “I was probably going a little fast.” “I looked down for a second.” Every one of those is a normal thing to say when you are shaken and someone else’s bumper is in your lane. Every one of them will appear, word for word, in the insurer’s file as an admission of fault, and you will hear it read back to you months later.

Admitting nothing at the scene does not mean being difficult. Give the officer your license, registration and insurance. Answer factual questions honestly, where you were, which lane, which direction. What you do not do is offer conclusions. You do not know how fast you were going to the mile per hour. You do not know yet whether you are hurt, so “I’m fine” is not a statement you are in a position to make.

The same rule applies to the recorded statement the other insurer will ask for. You are not required to give one, and giving one before you have spoken to a lawyer is the second most common way people lose points. Speak to us first.

What Partly Looks Like in Real Las Vegas Crashes

Shared fault is not an exotic situation. It is the default in several of the most common crash types in the valley.

  • Left turns. Las Vegas has switched many of its left turn signals to flashing yellow arrows, and a flashing yellow arrow means you may turn, but only after yielding to oncoming traffic. When the oncoming driver was speeding or ran a red, the turning driver still gets a percentage pinned on them for turning at all. We have written separately about who is at fault on unprotected left turns and flashing yellow arrows in Las Vegas.
  • Lane changes. Two cars merge into the same lane on the 215 or on Sahara and both drivers swear the other one came over. Signal use, mirror checks and who was already established in the lane all end up as percentages.
  • Speed. A driver pulls out of a shopping center on Rainbow into your path. You had the right of way, but you were doing 45 in a 35, and the insurer argues you would have stopped in time at the limit.
  • Seat belts. An adjuster may argue that your injuries would have been lighter with a belt on, and try to fold that into your fault percentage. That is a question about the extent of your injuries, not about who caused the crash, and it is one where the adjuster’s script and Nevada law are not the same thing. Do not accept a fault share on the strength of it.

In every one of those, the honest answer to “was it partly my fault” might be yes. The honest answer to “do I still have a case” is also yes, as long as your share does not outweigh theirs.

The Percentage Matters More When the Injuries Are Serious

The fault argument is loudest where the most is at stake. When a crash on US 95 leaves someone with a spinal cord injury, a traumatic brain injury or an amputation, the other side’s insurer does not accept a 10 percent share and move on. Every point they can attach to you is worth a great deal to them, and the argument gets a level of effort that a fender bender never sees.

That is why shared fault work in catastrophic injury cases starts on day one. Reconstruction, vehicle data, camera preservation letters and witness statements all need to be in hand before the insurer has finished building its own version. In a case that will fund a lifetime of care, a percentage is not a detail.

It also cuts the other way. When your own fault is real and significant, the right move is to find that out early and build the case around it. Every case turns on its own facts, and a shared fault case turns on them more than most.

You Still Have Two Years, and the Argument Does Not Wait

Nevada gives you two years to file a lawsuit for injuries to a person caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another. That is NRS 11.190, and a shared fault case gets the same two years as any other.

Do not read two years as time to spare. The deadline is for filing suit. The evidence that decides your percentage lives on a much shorter clock. Parking structure footage is gone in days. Witnesses move or stop answering. The other car is repaired or scrapped and the data with it. By the time a claim is a year old, the fault argument has usually hardened into whatever the crash report said.

If the insurer will not move on its number, the case is filed. In Clark County, smaller injury cases are routed first into Nevada’s court-annexed arbitration program for injury cases, where an arbitrator hears the same fault argument on a faster schedule. Larger cases go to a jury, which is where the general and special verdicts in NRS 41.141 actually get filled in.

What We Do with a Shared Fault Case

We do not start from the insurer’s percentage. We start from the crash. That means the report, the photographs, the video that still exists, the witnesses who will still talk, and the vehicles before they are repaired. From that we build our own account of what each driver did, and we put a number on it that we can defend. The adjuster has a percentage and a script. We have the file. When the two meet, the percentage usually moves, because opening bids are built to move.

If you were hurt in a crash anywhere in the Las Vegas valley and part of you believes it was your fault, do not decide on your own that you have no claim. Being partly responsible is not the same as being more responsible than the other driver, and that line is the only one that matters under Nevada law.

Tell us what happened, including the parts you think hurt you. You can reach us through our contact page and we will tell you plainly where your share of the fault is likely to land and what that does to your case.

Related Posts

Free Case Evaluation

The evaluation is FREE! You do not have to pay anything to have an attorney evaluate your case.