Artificial intelligence is changing the way companies hire. Employers increasingly rely on AI hiring tools, but algorithmic bias has raised legal and ethical concerns. What about your rights under federal law? Is there anything to do against AI hiring tools and algorithmic bias? Can you challenge unfair screening? How do federal anti-discrimination laws protect you if software excludes you based on protected characteristics?
If automated systems determine who gets interviewed or promoted, understanding your rights under federal law is crucial. Let’s look at the rules, your protections, and what to do if you face workplace discrimination through AI tools.
AI Hiring Tools and Algorithmic Bias: Your Rights Under Federal Law
Employers use artificial intelligence in many parts of the hiring process. These AI tools review resumes, analyze video interviews, and score assessments. Companies hope to save time and money. But algorithmic bias can unfairly harm job applicants, especially those with protected characteristics like national origin, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, or disabilities. This may also include other protected characteristics of an individual.
After all, companies need to implement risk management policies regarding artificial intelligence AI. We have legislation that prohibits employers the wrong use of AI.
For instance, if AI takes promotion decisions, there are chances that a deserving individual may not get their rights because of such tools. The law requires employers to take special care of such instances and ensure equality.
When employers use automated systems without human oversight or reasonable care, they may violate federal anti-discrimination laws. Even if technology decides, the law still holds employers responsible for employment-related decisions.
Understanding Bias in the Hiring Process
What does algorithmic discrimination look like? Imagine an AI system trained on past hiring data that favored men over female applicants, or younger candidates over older ones. Without careful design, ai algorithms replicate these biases.
Disparate impact discrimination happens when a practice that seems neutral ends up harming a protected class. It doesn’t need to be intentional discrimination to be illegal.
Federal laws say employers can’t simply blame AI vendors or third-party vendors. They are accountable for the results of these automated decision-making tools.
Federal Anti-Discrimination Laws That Apply
Your protections come from several key federal laws that regulate employment practices:
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act bars discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), and national origin.
Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) protects people 40 and older from age discrimination.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) bans discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities and requires reasonable accommodations.
Equal Pay Act mandates equal pay for equal work.
These laws are enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the key federal agency overseeing workplace discrimination. Even under the Trump administration, the EEOC paid close attention to risks from automated systems.
Current Federal Guidance on Automated Decision-Making Tools
in Hiring
The EEOC and the Department of Justice have issued federal guidance warning that AI hiring tools can violate anti-discrimination laws if used carelessly. In 2022, the EEOC explained that using automated employment decision tools to screen out people with disabilities, without considering reasonable accommodations, can violate the ADA.
Title VII liability also applies if these tools cause disparate impact discrimination against protected classes. Employers must evaluate AI tools for bias and ensure equal access to employment opportunities.
Employers need to:
- Conduct bias audits.
- Maintain risk management policies.
- Give advance notice when using automated tools.
- Ensure human oversight in employment-related decisions.
Failing these steps can lead to discrimination claims in district court, including places like the Northern District.
State and Local Laws Add Extra Protections against automated
Beyond federal laws, many state and local laws impose stricter rules on AI hiring tools and algorithmic bias. For example:
- New York City requires companies using automated employment decision tools to perform and publish bias audits each year.
- Illinois requires advance notice if AI analyzes video interviews.
Other jurisdictions are following suit to guarantee equal employment opportunity and prevent discrimination in employment based on protected characteristics.
Employer Responsibilities Under Employment Law
Employers cannot just say, “The software did it.” Under employment law, they must show reasonable care in using AI systems. That means they are responsible for ensuring any tool, even if from a third-party vendor, complies with federal, state, and local laws.
They must:
- Evaluate AI tools for potential disparate impact.
- Require bias audits from AI vendors.
- Build strong risk management policies to identify and reduce algorithmic bias.
- Train human decision makers to review automated decision systems carefully.
This applies to all employers, employment agencies, and other employment-based service providers.
Common Areas Where AI Bias Emerges
Bias in AI hiring tools often hides in plain sight. It can show up when:
- Resume screeners downgrade candidates with gaps in work history (impacting caregivers, often women).
- Video analysis tools misinterpret accents (hurting people based on their national origin).
- Personality tests exclude neurodiverse or disabled people.
- Tools trained on past data replicate old biases.
These systems can cause disparate impact even without intentional discrimination. This is why including an experienced employment lawyer in your lawsuit is important.
Your Rights as a Job Applicant or Employee
If you think automated tools rejected you unfairly based on protected characteristics, you have options. Under federal anti discrimination laws, you can:
- File a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Learn how to win an EEOC case.
- Use mediation or settlement options.
- Sue in district court if you get a right-to-sue letter.
You may also have rights under state and local laws, which sometimes provide stronger remedies.
Employers cannot retaliate against current employees or job applicants who enforce these rights. Protections against retaliation are strong under the Civil Rights Act, Employment Act, and Disabilities Act.
Role of Federal Agencies and Courts
Federal agencies like the EEOC investigate claims of bias from AI tools. They have sued employers for disparate impact discrimination and clarified in federal guidance that automated systems don’t excuse unintentional discrimination.
District courts, including the Northern District, have ruled that decisions made by algorithms are still subject to employment law. Employers cannot hide behind technology.
Data Privacy and Vendor Accountability
Data privacy is also essential. When employers share applicant data with AI vendors or third-party vendors, they must secure that data and use it lawfully. Poor data practices can introduce bias and violate state and local laws.
Employers need to vet AI vendors, demand transparency about AI algorithms, and set clear rules for automated decision-making tools.
Ensuring Equal Access and Fairness
At its heart, the issue of AI hiring tools, algorithmic bias, and your rights under federal law is about fairness. Employers must ensure equal access to jobs for all people, regardless of protected characteristics.
Do these tools help find the best candidates? Or do they repeat old patterns of discrimination in new, digital forms? That’s the question employers must ask. And you have the right to ask it too.
AI Hiring Tools and Algorithmic Bias: Your Rights Under Federal Law — Final Thoughts
Artificial intelligence is transforming how companies make hiring decisions. But even the most advanced automated systems must follow federal anti-discrimination laws, along with state and local protections.
Understanding AI hiring tools, algorithmic bias, and your rights under federal law is not just about technology—it’s about protecting people from unfair treatment. Whether you’re applying for a job or already employed, you have the right to a fair process and equal employment opportunity.
Fight Against AI Hiring Tools and Algorithmic Bias
If you believe you’ve faced discrimination because of AI tools, don’t stay silent. Learn your rights, hold employers accountable, and seek professional legal support when needed. Our employment lawyers at Bourassa Law Group are here for you.
If you need help with an employment discrimination issue—including bias from AI in hiring—reach out to Bourassa Law Group today for trusted legal guidance.
1-800-870-8910