You interviewed well, the hiring manager said an offer was coming, and then the process went quiet. A bad job reference from a former employer can end an offer without anyone telling you why. Nevada law gives former employers some protection for what they say. It also sets limits on what they may do to a former worker’s job search.
This article explains the Nevada statutes that matter most, NRS 41.755 on employer immunity and NRS 613.200 and 613.210 on blacklisting. It covers what a former employer may say, when the protection disappears, and how to find out what is being said about you. It is general information, and your own facts decide how the law applies.
Is a bad job reference against the law in Nevada?
Not automatically. Nevada does not make every negative statement unlawful. A former employer that tells the truth about your performance is often protected. The protection has edges, and the edges are where most disputes live.
NRS 41.755 gives an employer immunity from civil liability for certain disclosures about a worker. In plain terms, a civil lawsuit over a protected disclosure generally cannot succeed. The statute lists the topics that are covered, the conditions that apply and the situations where immunity is lost.
What does NRS 41.755 protect?
Subsection 1 says an employer who, at the request of an employee, discloses certain information to a prospective employer of that employee “is immune from civil liability for such disclosure and its consequences.” Three topics are covered.
- The employee’s ability to perform the job.
- The diligence, skill or reliability with which the employee carried out the duties of the job.
- An illegal or wrongful act committed by the employee.
Two definitions widen the picture. “Employee” includes a person who previously rendered time and services to the employer, so the statute covers former workers. “Employer” includes an employee or agent who is authorized by the employer to disclose information. A human resources representative, or a manager designated to answer reference calls, fits that definition. A coworker who passes along gossip without authority is not described by it.
When does the immunity not apply?
Subsection 3 takes the immunity away in six situations. An employer is not immune if it did any of these things.
- Acted with malice or ill will.
- Disclosed information that the employer believed was inaccurate.
- Disclosed information that the employer had no reasonable grounds for believing was accurate.
- Recklessly or intentionally disclosed inaccurate information.
- Deliberately disclosed misleading information.
- Disclosed information in violation of a state or federal law or in violation of an agreement with the employee.
The first five turn on accuracy and state of mind. If a former employer says you were fired for theft and you were laid off, the statement is inaccurate, and several of those exceptions come into play. If the employer says you missed many shifts and the attendance records show it, the statement is accurate.
The sixth exception turns on law and contract. Some separation agreements promise a neutral reference, such as dates of employment and job title only. A disclosure that goes beyond what the agreement allows can fall under that exception. If you signed an agreement like that, keep a copy.
What if you never asked the employer to give a reference?
This is the question the statute leaves open. The immunity in subsection 1 applies to a disclosure made “at the request of an employee.” It does not say what protects a disclosure that nobody requested, such as a prospective employer’s call to a former supervisor whose name you never gave.
That gap matters. If the immunity does not reach a disclosure, other rules decide the case. Defamation law generally turns on whether a statement was false, so truth remains a strong defense for the employer. Whether a release you signed on a job application counts as a request is a question for a lawyer, because the statute does not say.
What about applying to be a police officer or firefighter?
Public safety jobs follow a separate track. NRS 239B.020 says that on a public safety agency’s request, an employer must provide available information about a current or former employee who is an applicant for firefighter or peace officer. The request must be in writing and come with an authorization that the applicant has signed and had notarized. A sworn officer or other authorized representative of the agency must present it.
The information can include dates of employment, a list of pay, the application the person submitted, a written performance evaluation, and attendance and disciplinary records. It can also include a statement on whether the employer would rehire the applicant and why not, and the reason the job ended. NRS 41.755 gives employers immunity for these disclosures too, subject to the same exceptions for malice, inaccuracy and the rest. For an applicant to a public safety agency, the file can hold more detail than a typical reference call would cover.
What does Nevada’s blacklisting law add?
NRS 613.200 covers any person or company in this State, and any agent or officer. It is a gross misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $5,000, to willfully do anything intended to prevent a person who left or was discharged from obtaining employment elsewhere in this State. The Labor Commissioner may also impose an administrative penalty of not more than $5,000 for each violation.
NRS 613.210 is the companion rule. It says a person shall not blacklist, or publish the name of, an employee discharged by that person with the intent to prevent that employee from getting similar or other employment from any other person. An officer or agent who does so is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Both statutes turn on intent. A harsh but truthful reference is not automatically a blacklisting. A campaign of calls meant to keep you from getting hired is the kind of conduct the statutes describe. These are penalty provisions, and their text does not give a worker a right to sue under them. A lawyer can tell you whether the same facts support a civil claim.
What if the reference is harsh but true?
A truthful reference that happens to be unflattering is the hardest case. NRS 41.755 says an employer that discloses accurate information on the listed topics at your request is immune, unless one of the exceptions applies. The blacklisting statutes need intent to prevent you from working, and a plain account of your record does not show that by itself.
In that situation the better tools are practical. Ask for the written statement described below, line up other references, and be ready to explain the history in your own words at the interview. A lawyer can still check whether each statement was accurate, because a reference that mixes true and false points may lose protection.
Can you demand a written statement from your former employer?
Yes, within limits. NRS 613.210 says the blacklisting rules do not stop an employer from giving, in writing at the time an employee leaves or is discharged, a truthful statement of the reason. They also do not stop an employer from giving a statement about meritorious services. The statute says the employer shall supply these statements on demand from the employee. No statement is required unless the employee served for at least 60 days, and only one statement may be issued.
The statement matters because it fixes the employer’s account. Suppose the letter says you left over a scheduling conflict and a later caller hears that you were fired for cause. The mismatch can show that someone is not telling the same story twice. Ask for the statement in writing, keep the reply, and keep proof of the date you asked.
How can you find out what a former employer is saying?
- Ask the new employer, politely, whether any concern came up in a reference check. Some will share the gist.
- Ask your former employer’s human resources office who is authorized to give references and what the company’s policy is. Some companies confirm only dates and job title.
- Send a written request for the statement described in NRS 613.210.
- Keep a log of every offer that stalled, with dates, names and the messages that ended it.
- Write down the names of anyone who told you what was said, and when they said it.
- Line up references who saw your work firsthand, ask each person first, and keep their contact details.
Do not call a former manager to argue. A calm written message asking that any reference stick to accurate facts is safer than a heated phone call, and it leaves a record.
How long do you have to act?
NRS 11.190 lists the time limits for different kinds of lawsuits. For an action for libel or slander, it says within 2 years. That section does not itself say when the clock starts for a reference dispute, and the starting point can be argued, so do not assume it begins on the day you find out. The blacklisting statutes are penalty provisions, and other claims have their own limits. A lawyer can count the days, and the count is easier when you start from the first date you can document.
What should you gather before talking to a lawyer?
Collect the documents that show who you were as a worker. Performance reviews, commendations, awards and emails praising your work answer the accuracy question. Gather the termination letter, the separation agreement if there was one, and any release you signed with a job application. Add the job postings and offer emails for the positions that fell through. A lawyer can use that paper to see whether a statement was inaccurate, whether it was authorized and whether intent is a fair question.
When the reference is really retaliation
Some bad references follow a complaint. A worker who reported discrimination, asked about unpaid wages or took protected leave may hear that the former employer is saying negative things. Timing matters in those cases. A new complaint about your work that appears right after you spoke up deserves a closer look. Our article on signs your employer is retaliating after a workplace complaint walks through the patterns that tend to matter.
When a serious injury sits behind the gap in your work history
Not every job-search problem starts with a conflict at work. A serious injury can leave months out of a work history and strain the relationship with a former employer. If the injury happened on the job and a comp claim followed, our article on being fired after a workers’ comp claim in Nevada covers that situation. If someone else caused the injury, a claim against that person is separate from any reference dispute. Our catastrophic injury practice handles serious injury claims, and both kinds of claim rely on records from the same period.
Get the record in order before you answer
The sooner the timeline is written down, the easier it is to tell a harsh opinion from a statement the law does not protect. A lawyer who handles employment cases in Las Vegas can read the statute, your paperwork and the messages together. The Bourassa Law Group offers a free consultation to workers who think a former employer is hurting their job search. You can reach us through the contact page.
This article is general information about Nevada law, not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.
1-800-870-8910