Two people hold the same job at the same Las Vegas workplace. One is a woman and one is a man, and the man takes home more for every hour. Nevada has a statute written for that situation, NRS 608.017, and it is shorter than most people expect. This article explains what the Nevada equal pay law says and how its key terms work. It also covers the exceptions employers rely on and how the federal Equal Pay Act and the sex discrimination rules fit around it.
What does NRS 608.017 say?
The core rule is one sentence. It is unlawful for any employer to discriminate between employees, employed within the same establishment, on the basis of sex. The discrimination in question is paying lower wages to one employee than to an employee of the opposite sex who performs equal work. The work must require equal skill, effort and responsibility, and it must be performed under similar working conditions. Broken into parts, a claim under this section usually needs these pieces.
- Two employees at the same establishment.
- Lower wages for one of them because of sex.
- Equal work for both, measured by skill, effort and responsibility.
- Similar working conditions.
The statute then lists exceptions, which are covered below, and adds a rule against fixing a gap by cutting pay. The section speaks of “any employer” and does not set a minimum number of employees in its text. It also speaks of the opposite sex. A worker whose situation does not fit that wording may still have a claim under the broader discrimination chapter. NRS 613.330 lists sex, sexual orientation and gender identity or expression among its grounds, and it reaches compensation.
What counts as equal work?
The Nevada text closely tracks the federal Equal Pay Act, which uses almost the same words. The EEOC explains the federal version this way. The jobs need not be identical, but they must be substantially equal, and job content, not job title, decides whether they are. That is a useful guide to how to read the Nevada words, although a Nevada decision-maker applies the Nevada text.
The federal regulations go further and treat skill, effort and responsibility as separate tests, each of which must be met. They say equal does not mean identical, and minor differences do not defeat a comparison. Skill includes experience, training, education and ability, measured by what the job requires and not by what a particular employee happens to know. Effort covers physical or mental exertion, including the stress a job carries, and two jobs can require equal effort even when it is spent in different ways. Responsibility is about accountability and the importance of the job obligation. Working conditions cover surroundings and hazards, such as fumes or physical danger, and the regulation adds that working conditions do not include shift differentials.
Take two banquet captains at one resort. Both run the same events, supervise the same size of crew and carry the same responsibility for the room. One has the title “senior” and the other does not, but their daily work is the same. The title would not erase the comparison. Now take a captain and a dishwasher at the same resort. Their pay may differ for reasons that have nothing to do with sex, because the skill, effort and responsibility are not equal.
The EEOC also says all forms of pay are covered by the federal law, including salary, overtime pay, bonuses, stock options, profit sharing and bonus plans, vacation and holiday pay, and benefits. The Nevada section speaks of “wages,” so how far it reaches bonuses and benefits is a question for a lawyer.
What does “same establishment” mean?
The statute compares employees within the same establishment. The federal Equal Pay Act regulations say an establishment refers to a distinct physical place of business rather than an entire business with several locations. Each physically separate place of business is ordinarily treated as a separate establishment. The same regulation allows unusual cases, such as a central office that hires everyone, sets all wages and moves employees between sites.
That matters in a city with large employers that run more than one property. A woman at one location who learns that a man at another location with the same title earns more may face a hard question under this wording. Nevada’s section uses the same word, but whether Nevada decision-makers read it the way the federal regulation does is something a lawyer should check against the facts.
Which exceptions can an employer rely on?
Subsection 2 says the equal pay rule does not apply where wages are paid under one of four arrangements.
- A seniority system.
- A merit system.
- A compensation system under which wages are determined by the quality or quantity of production.
- A wage differential based on factors other than sex.
The fourth is the broadest. An employer who relies on it should be able to name the factor and show that sex played no part. Employers often point to experience, training or a night-shift differential. Whether a reason holds up depends on the facts and on whether it is applied the same way to men and women. A written pay scale or policy is one place to look for the stated reason.
Can an employer fix a gap by cutting someone’s pay?
No. Subsection 3 says an employer who violates the section shall not reduce the wages of any employees to comply. The EEOC says the same about the federal law, noting that employers may not reduce the wages of either sex to equalize pay. The way to close a gap without cutting anyone’s pay is to raise the lower pay.
How do federal law and the discrimination chapter fit in?
Three layers can apply to one pay gap. The first is NRS 608.017. The second is the federal Equal Pay Act. The third is the sex discrimination rules, federal Title VII and Nevada’s NRS 613.330, which make it unlawful to discriminate in compensation because of sex.
Coverage differs by layer. The EEOC lists virtually all employers as covered by the Equal Pay Act and employers with 15 or more employees as covered by Title VII. Nevada’s discrimination chapter uses a similar 15-employee definition of employer. The text of NRS 608.017 speaks of any employer and sets no minimum. For a small Las Vegas business, that difference can decide which claim is available.
The EEOC’s equal pay and compensation discrimination page describes some differences. A person alleging an Equal Pay Act violation may go directly to court and does not have to file an EEOC charge first. The time limit for both a charge and a lawsuit is two years from the alleged unlawful pay practice, or three years for a willful violation. Title VII is different. It generally has a shorter filing period for an EEOC charge, listed as 180 days, which may be extended by state laws. The EEOC adds that Title VII has no requirement that the jobs be substantially equal. That means a worker who cannot find a perfectly matching comparator may still raise a sex-based pay claim.
On the Nevada side, a person injured by an unlawful employment practice under the discrimination chapter may file a complaint with the Nevada Equal Rights Commission. Sex is one of the grounds that qualifies. Which path fits a given pay gap, and which deadline controls, depends on the facts. Missing a short window can end a claim.
What if the employer reacts badly to your question?
Raising a pay gap can be uncomfortable, and some workers worry about the response. NRS 613.340 makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an employee who has opposed a practice made unlawful by the discrimination chapter. Sex-based pay discrimination under NRS 613.330 is one of those practices. The same protection reaches an employee who has made a charge or taken part in an investigation. A schedule cut, a demotion or a sudden write-up after a pay question is worth documenting right away.
Where does a Nevada pay complaint go?
NRS 608.017 sits in the wage chapter. The Labor Commissioner shall enforce the state’s labor laws unless enforcement is vested exclusively in some other officer, board or commission. The Labor Commissioner may also act whether or not a claim has been made, and the statute says the remedies under the labor laws are cumulative. Our post on the Nevada Labor Commissioner wage claim or suing your employer explains how those routes compare.
The discrimination routes run through the Nevada Equal Rights Commission and the EEOC, as described above. A lawyer can sort out which door to use first, and in some cases more than one can apply.
What should you collect before you raise a pay gap?
Start with your own records. Pay stubs, your offer letter, any raise or bonus emails, your job description and your performance reviews show what you earn and what you do. Write a short description of your daily duties in your own words, with dates. Note the skills, certifications and responsibilities you bring. Save the job posting you applied under, any promotion announcement and the review where your duties were described.
Then look at what you know about the comparison. Who does the same work at the same location? What are their titles, hours and shifts? Write down only what you learned honestly, and do not copy confidential payroll files. Nevada’s discrimination chapter also protects workers who inquire about, discuss or voluntarily disclose wages, with an exception for people whose essential job functions give them access to other workers’ pay. For a closer look at building proof, see our post on how to prove pay discrimination.
Pay records matter outside discrimination too. If a worker is seriously injured, lost earnings are usually measured from what the worker was paid, which is one more reason to keep accurate pay records. Our catastrophic injury practice page shows how lost earnings fit into a serious injury claim.
Start with the pay records and a lawyer’s read
A pay gap can look clear on a stub and murky once job duties, locations and pay systems are laid side by side. A lawyer who handles employment cases in Las Vegas can read the documents with you and say which of the three layers fits. The Bourassa Law Group offers a free consultation to workers who believe they are paid less because of sex. You can begin through the contact page.
This article is general information about Nevada law, not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.
1-800-870-8910