The termination paper has one word on the reason line, and the word is misconduct. A banquet server in Las Vegas gets that paper, files for unemployment the next morning and wonders whether the label ends her claim. If you were fired for misconduct, you can still apply, and the label does not decide the claim by itself. Nevada law has a specific rule for these firings, a specific way of judging them and a short deadline for appealing a denial. This article explains each piece in plain terms.
What does NRS 612.385 say?
The rule is one long sentence. A person is ineligible for benefits for the week in which the person has filed a claim if he or she was discharged from the last or next to last employment for misconduct connected with the person’s work. The person then remains ineligible until he or she earns pay in covered employment that equals or exceeds the weekly benefit amount in each of not more than 15 weeks. The Administrator decides the number of weeks in each case according to the seriousness of the misconduct. The text is on the Nevada statute page for NRS 612.385.
Four details in that sentence are worth slowing down for.
- The rule covers a discharge from the last or the next to last job, so a firing from the job before your most recent one can still matter.
- The misconduct must be connected with the person’s work.
- The period of ineligibility is tied to the seriousness of the misconduct, and the statute caps it at 15 weeks of qualifying earnings.
- The cure is work. Earning at least your weekly benefit amount in covered employment for the required number of weeks ends the disqualification.
So a misconduct finding is a penalty with an end point. It is not a lifetime ban, although the weeks without benefits can be hard to absorb.
Here is how that works at the high end. If the Administrator sets the number at the statutory maximum, the person must earn at least the weekly benefit amount in each of 15 weeks of covered work before the disqualification ends. A lower number means a shorter work requirement. The number does not come from the label on the termination paper. The seriousness of the conduct drives it.
Who decides whether it was misconduct?
The state decides, not the employer. Unemployment claims in Nevada are handled by the Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation through its Employment Security Division. An employer can protest a claim by giving the division facts about why the job ended, and the division then issues a written determination. The label is not final. An article in the State Bar of Nevada’s magazine, summarizing Nevada Supreme Court decisions, says the employer bears the burden of proving disqualifying misconduct by a preponderance of the evidence. That means the employer has to show it is more likely than not that the conduct qualifies.
The same article gives an example. An employee fired for insubordination, meaning a single or continual refusal to obey a reasonable order, can still be found entitled to benefits if the employee convinces the division that the termination was improper.
Your own account matters. Anything you say on the claim, in an interview or in a written response can become part of the record. Keep your answers accurate and consistent, and do not guess at dates or quotes you cannot support.
How does Nevada define misconduct?
NRS 612.385 does not define the word. The detail comes from Nevada Supreme Court decisions, as described in that same State Bar article. Disqualifying misconduct occurs when an employee deliberately and unjustifiably violates or disregards the employer’s reasonable policy or standard. It also occurs when the employee acts in such a careless or negligent manner as to show a substantial disregard of the employer’s interests or the employee’s duties to the employer.
The decisions also draw lines in the other direction. Ordinary negligence in isolated instances and good faith errors in judgment or discretion are excluded. The conduct must also involve an element of wrongfulness. In plain terms, a mistake is not misconduct, and a choice to break a fair rule can be.
That difference explains why two firings with the same label can end differently. A cashier who takes cash from a drawer and a cashier who miscounts change at the end of a long shift are in different positions, even if both receive a write-up. The first involves a deliberate act. The second looks like an error.
Do attendance problems count as misconduct?
The State Bar article calls a discharge for absenteeism a common scenario, and it describes how Nevada decisions treat it. An absence generally counts as misconduct only if the circumstances show it was taken in willful violation or disregard of a reasonable employment policy, or if it lacked the appropriate accompanying notice.
That makes notice a central fact. Did the policy say how to call in? Did you follow it? A text message to a supervisor, a call log, a doctor’s note or a shift-swap request can show that an absence was reported the way the policy asked. Illness and emergencies do not look like willful violations. A string of no-call, no-show absences looks very different.
What if the reason was poor performance and not misconduct?
Employers sometimes use the word misconduct when the real complaint is that someone fell short of a standard. The exclusions above matter here. Ordinary negligence in isolated instances and good faith errors are not misconduct under the decisions. A worker who tried and missed a target, or who made an honest mistake on a complex task, is in a different position from a worker who ignored a clear, reasonable rule on purpose.
The facts around the standard also matter. Was the rule reasonable and clear? Was it applied to others? Did the employer warn you before the firing? Warnings and prior write-ups can help the employer show a pattern. Their absence can help you show that the conduct was an isolated mistake.
How can you test the employer’s story?
Treat the employer’s reason as a set of claims to check. A few questions help sort the solid ones from the weak ones.
- Which exact rule or standard did you break, and is it written down?
- Was the rule reasonable, and did you know about it?
- Was the conduct deliberate, or was it a mistake or a misunderstanding?
- Did the employer enforce the same rule the same way against other workers?
- Was there an investigation, and were you given a chance to explain?
- Does the date of the firing line up with something else, such as a complaint, an injury report or a leave request?
None of these questions decides a claim alone. Together they show whether the label fits the facts. If you can answer them with documents and witnesses, you are better prepared for a hearing than if you rely on memory alone.
How does the appeal work?
If the division finds you ineligible, the next step is an appeal, and the deadline is short. Under NRS 612.495, an appeal must be filed within 11 days after the date of mailing or personal service of the notice of determination. The 11-day period may be extended for good cause shown, but you should not plan on an extension. The statute counts by excluding the day the determination was mailed and including the last day. If the last day is a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, that day is also excluded. Check the mailing date on your notice and file well before the last day.
If you already missed the date, tell the Appeal Tribunal why you were late, because the statute allows an extension for good cause shown. A lawyer can help present that reason. While an appeal is pending, keep filing your weekly claims. The State Bar article says the claimant must continue to file them.
The appeal goes to an Appeal Tribunal, and the Administrator is a party to it. An employer whose rights may be affected can ask to take part as well. The State Bar article says hearings are often held by telephone and are informal, and hearsay can be admitted as evidence. A tribunal decision can be appealed to the Board of Review, and the Board’s decisions can be appealed to the district court.
What should you gather before the hearing?
Build a simple file before the call. Include the termination notice, the policy the employer says you broke, any warnings or write-ups, and the messages that show what you were told. Add schedules, call logs, performance reviews and any record of how the same rule was applied to others. Write a timeline with dates and names. List anyone who saw or heard what happened, since a first-hand witness can speak to what happened more directly than a secondhand account.
Practice describing what happened in order, in short sentences, without arguing about everything. Tell the truth and answer the question you were asked. If you do not know a date, say so and then check your records. An exaggeration or a changed story can do more harm than a bad fact.
When does the misconduct label point to something else?
Sometimes the stated reason covers a different story. A worker who reported discrimination, filed a workers’ compensation claim or asked for medical leave may be written up for conduct that nobody mentioned before. Our post on being fired after a workers’ comp claim in Nevada explains one version of that pattern. If the firing followed a leave request, see what to do immediately after being fired for requesting medical leave.
The unemployment case and an employment claim ask different questions, so what is said in one can matter in the other. Talk with a lawyer about how the two fit together before you give detailed statements in either place.
A firing can also come during recovery from a serious injury, when an employer cites missed work or restrictions. That raises injury-claim questions that sit next to the unemployment case and not inside it. Those questions belong with our catastrophic injury practice, which handles serious injury claims on their own timeline.
Answer the notice first, then get a lawyer’s read
The calendar comes before everything else. Once you have the notice, mark the 11-day deadline and file the appeal in time. Then bring the notice, the termination paper and your timeline to a lawyer who handles employment cases in Las Vegas. The Bourassa Law Group offers a free consultation to workers who were let go under a misconduct label and want to understand their options. You can start with the contact page.
This article is general information about Nevada law, not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.
1-800-870-8910